Lessons from Mao’s Cultural Revolution
Tell me if this sounds familiar. At the height of Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution, China’s universities stopped being places of learning. They became factories of ideological conformity.
Teachers and administrators who didn’t embrace the Communist revolution were branded “rightists.” Students were told to find them, expose them, and punish them. Many obeyed with religious zeal, convinced that loyalty to Mao outweighed every other moral duty.
The Rise of the Red Guards
From this fanaticism emerged the Red Guards — militant bands of teenagers unleashed upon society. With Mao’s blessing, they stormed through cities and villages declaring themselves defenders of revolutionary purity.
They tore down monuments, burned books, and desecrated temples. Teachers were beaten. Children informed on their parents. Neighbors became accusers and victims all at once. It wasn’t random chaos — it was the logical outcome of what they’d been taught.
The Redefinition of Morality
Disagreement itself was redefined. To question the Party was not merely to be wrong; it was to be inhuman. And once an idea is labeled inhuman, violence against it becomes not only acceptable, but righteous.
The act of silencing or destroying an opponent was no longer seen as cruelty — it was seen as virtue. The moral compass had been inverted so completely that brutality felt like heroism.
Fear replaced trust. Education gave way to indoctrination. Intellectual independence disappeared under the threat of public denunciation. Families disintegrated as children betrayed parents to prove loyalty to the revolution. By the time it ended, millions were dead, and the cultural memory of a nation lay in ruins.
A Pattern That Echoes Through Time
The lesson is dark, but it echoes through history:
When youth are weaponized by ideology…
When universities teach obedience instead of curiosity…
When disagreement becomes criminal…
Violence stops being taboo. It becomes justice.
Mao understood something terrifying: it’s easier to control a society by igniting passion from below than by enforcing power from above. Once the young believe their violence is virtuous, the revolution will devour its own.
What We Must Remember
The Cultural Revolution warns us what happens when certainty replaces curiosity and purity tests replace reasoned debate. The worst atrocities are not committed by those who know they are evil — but by those convinced they are righteous.
A Call to Vigilance
We must stay vigilant. Defend the spaces where disagreement is possible. Protect the right to question without fear. Resist the seductive clarity of ideologies that divide the world into saints and sinners.
Teach the next generation to think — not to march. To question their own certainty. To see even their enemies as human beings worthy of dignity.
History’s graves are filled with people who thought their cause justified cruelty. The question for our time is simple: Will we have the wisdom and courage to stop it before it consumes us?
I wrote the commentary on this document, but I didn’t write the original message at the top. I don’t know who did but thought it was important to share with my thoughts added.
No Loss for Words 
AI and the Beginning of Possibility
by Steve DanaBy Steve Dana
A week or so ago, I wrote about my exploration of AI platforms. After letting the topic sit with me for a few days, here’s where I’ve landed: Artificial Intelligence isn’t the end of the world — it’s the beginning of a new array of possibilities. Bold? Maybe. But stay with me.
I’ve been retired from real estate for five years now, and in that time AI has gone from a faint whisper to a constant roar. And here’s the surprising part: I’ve watched how it empowers us far more than it threatens us.
Back when I was selling real estate, AI wasn’t on anyone’s radar. We relied on instinct, experience, and mountains of paperwork. Today, agents can analyze markets, identify trends, and match clients with remarkable precision. The research that once devoured hours can now be done in minutes. That isn’t a threat — it’s liberation. It frees people to do the human work: building trust, negotiating deals, and guiding clients through life-changing decisions. Machines can crunch numbers. They can’t replace relationship.
And I’ll be honest: I’m not your neighborhood tech wizard. I didn’t go back to school. I learned AI the same way many of you might — by experimenting, asking questions, trying tools like Copilot, Claude, and ChatGPT. If I can do this in my seventies, so can anybody with curiosity and a little patience.
So why the panic? Why the fear? Because fear thrives in uncertainty. When people hear stories about layoffs or machines writing code, they imagine a future where humans are obsolete. But history tells us something different. Every great technological leap — from the steam engine to the internet — has displaced some jobs and created many more. The danger isn’t AI. The danger is refusing to adapt. If we dig our heels in, yes, we’ll be left behind. But if we embrace change, retrain, and reinvent ourselves, then the future opens up.
I’ve come to see AI as a power tool. A carpenter doesn’t fear a nail gun; he uses it to build faster and better. A writer doesn’t fear a word processor; she uses it to refine her work. AI is the next power tool in the human toolbox — one that amplifies what we already do well.
For coders, it can debug faster.
For teachers, it can personalize lessons.
For doctors, it can analyze scans in seconds.
For political commentators like me, it helps sharpen arguments and cut through noise.
But in every one of these examples, the human being remains at the center. AI cannot replace judgment, empathy, integrity, or vision. Those remain uniquely ours.
Now imagine a world where education adapts to every student… where rural clinics diagnose illness with big-city precision… where small businesses compete globally because AI levels the playing field. Imagine journalists who can sift through a mountain of documents in minutes, or real estate agents who can generate valuations on the spot. This isn’t science fiction. It’s already happening.
Of course, with great power comes great responsibility. We need transparency in how algorithms work, fairness in how they’re applied, and accountability so humans stay in control. These aren’t minor challenges — but they are solvable. And they require citizens who stay informed rather than afraid.
So when you hear fearmongering about AI, remember this: the answer isn’t shutting it down. The answer is shaping it.
Practical Advice Moving Forward
AI isn’t the apocalypse. It’s the dawn of a new frontier. The question isn’t whether AI will change the world — it already has. The question is whether we’re willing to change with it.
I believe we are. I believe we can. And I believe that if we embrace AI as a partner — as a power tool that multiplies human potential — then the future will be brighter than anything we’ve imagined.
So the next time someone tells you AI is the end of work, tell them this:
AI isn’t the end of humanity. It’s the end of limits. And the beginning of possibility.
Posted in AI Artificial Intelligence, Political commentary | 1 Comment »