Archive for ‘Political commentary’

June 18, 2011

Get Back in The Game!

by Steve Dana

My blog has been silent for a while now.  It’s not that I haven’t had anything to say, much to the contrary; I had so much I wanted to say I felt I needed to hold my tongue lest I say things I would regret later.  I have been overwhelmed with what was and is happening in our country today.  What bothers me is the fact that everyone else is not bothered.  What bothers me is the fact that our country is going into the tank because we are “too busy” to get involved.

For the most part, my ramblings have been politically driven.  Occasionally I offer things of an entertainment nature, but my interest is in enlightening my readers with my take on current events.  My old departed dad always told me “if you want to criticize, make sure you have alternative ideas to offer” and out of that came a forty year stream of criticisms and alternatives.

I got involved in local government because I criticized the status quo and thought I had a better idea.  When I was elected to office, I found that my ideas were as good as the other ones on the table.  I served eight years.

When I tried to run for higher office, I learned that politics is not about better ideas, it’s about amassing power.  Only idealistic folks like me get involved to look out for the common folks and not special interests.

I said a couple years ago that I was running for County Council because I didn’t see anyone else stepping up who would advocate for the people the way I felt I would.  When I lost that election the momentum for the TEA Party was just beginning to roll.  I was disappointed that it was too late to make a difference in my race but excited that it carried over to huge gains in 2010.

There has never been a more important time for people in our country to get involved in the public process.  The down-turn in the economy exposed the critical flaws in our government system that at the least allowed us to defer payment for public obligations without limits.  Public debt is crippling our country; not just at the federal level, but right on down to the local level through bond indebtedness that erodes current revenue buying power.  All so government can buy your silence.  Add to that the crushing regulatory burdens being heaped on all of us and it’s not surprising were going down.

We are dangerously close to the point where it won’t matter.  When we reach a point where current revenues are consumed by debt service costs there won’t be any services. 

I guess we can party on as the Titanic goes down….. or we can get involved by supporting candidates that support the U.S Constitution and the concepts embodied therein.

I would recommend that anyone who wants to get involved in a meaningful campaign in this local government election cycle get connected with the MIKE HOPE for Snohomish County Executive committee.  Mike has become a very accomplished elected official in a very short time period and is someone I support.  Mike will be the first Republican County Executive inSnohomishCounty history.  His election will change the tone of county government for the better.

I haven’t worked out my thoughts about the national political scene.  I know our country has suffered since President Obama was elected.  Unfortunately the entrenched Republicans have not demonstrated a willingness to do anything more than wring their hands.  The people in the country want action and the politicians want to preserve their jobs.

Senator Jim DeMint from South Carolina seems to be on the right path.  Rand Paul has some good things to offer as well.  I like Michele Bachmann.  Stay tuned.

March 28, 2011

“Gadaffi Must Go!” says Barack Obama

by Steve Dana

I know it is not politically correct to advocate assassination of foreign heads of state, but wouldn’t that solve our problem in Libya?  Rather than sending in our army to fight his army, why don’t we just send in a black ops team to pick off Gadaffi and his sons?  They wouldn’t even have to be American assets.  There are probably other countries capable of carrying out this mission.  We might also get the wordsmiths working on the language that describes the action in more socially acceptable language.

read more »

March 24, 2011

The Savaging of Barry Bonds

by Steve Dana

Even though I have never been a rabid fan of professional baseball, I try to stay up on what’s happening with the home team and over time get to know most of the movers and shakers on the other teams.  How could anyone not know who Barry Bonds is?

Here’s what I know about Bonds.  He’s been a helluva player his whole career.  He was a superb outfielder and he hit more home runs than any other player in history.  He has never been cooperative with media folks trying to cover him and his teams for their readers and viewers.  He’s a ball player, not a media darling.  Like many other high profile players, his name came up in the course of the national discussion about steroids in sports.

read more »

March 9, 2011

NPR Off the Dole!

by Steve Dana

What are we to think about this current flap at National Public Radio?  The guy who is at the center of the controversy was not a low level employee in a remote location that strayed from the company line; he was a highly placed executive responsible for fund-raising at NPR.  It is not unreasonable to conclude that others that worked for and with Ron Schiller may have shared his views in their efforts to raise money for the organization.

That concerns me.

When NPR terminated Juan Williams a couple months ago for making comments about his personal feelings, NPR said that company policy limited the types of comments their commentators could make and Mr. Williams violated that policy.

Executives at NPR lost their jobs following the Juan Williams controversy and now top executives are again losing their jobs suggest that the organization has serious problems at the very top of the heap.

You would think an organization called National Public Radio would offer diverse opinions about issues of interest to all Americans; a mix of liberal, moderate and conservative staff that provided something for everyone.

Apparently the National and Public parts in the name just have to do with who pays for it.  The federal government gives NPR $400 million per year to an organization that has demonstrated a couple times now that they have more than a liberal bias, they have serious animosity about anyone who doesn’t share their views.

It’s too bad that our public money is given to organizations clearly not supporting mainstream public benefit causes.

I hope the government suspends future federal contributions to NPR.  I don’t object to a private organization having their opinions, but I don’t want public money paying for it.  I suspect liberals don’t want to pay for conservative media either.