Archive for ‘Snohomish County Council’

July 26, 2009

What is a Republican? Who is a Republican?

by Steve Dana

There is no doubt that the economy is on the minds of taxpayers in our country these days. Leadership at the highest level is confirming our belief that a turn-around will not come without significant cost. Electing candidates to any office that believe in re-distributing your wealth tend to do that.

The American Dream I grew up believing in is “You work hard, invest your money, be active in your community to make life better for everyone.” Not taking from the rich to give to the poor! Everyone earns their way the best they can.

The American people felt they needed to go in a different direction after eight years of George Bush. The message of “hope” that Obama preached sounded good to needy voters across the country. That coupled with an historic election of the first black president blinded voters to the facts about Obama’s true colors. (no pun intended) Everything we knew about him before the election suggested what kind of president he would be and his actions after the election should surprise no one.

Our party has at least two years of tough sledding ahead of us before the first opportunity to make things right. How we spend that time will have some bearing on our success as Republicans in 2010.

This year, we face a somewhat different challenge. The opposition party has been entrenched in the county executive’s office for 24 years and controlled the county council for a couple years now so they cannot point the finger at Republicans and lay blame for problems of their own making. Our challenge is to make them take ownership of the failures of their policies.

Property tax rates have never been higher even as property values have plunged. When our property values were increasing because of market forces and high developer costs, we seemed pretty happy about our windfall of equity. Now as our taxes are going even higher we are having trouble understanding why when our house is now worth $100,000 less than a year ago. The truth is the euphoria associated with a robust economy dulled our resolve to constrain the growth of government and it seemed that we would expand the economy to cover the long term liability. If it weren’t so painful, it would be comical. I talked about the necessity of adopting more conservative financial management policies long before the crash. When you are celebrating the inflated value of your 401K you tend to ignore warning signs.

My experience in city government taught me about adopting long term financial management policies during hard times so you know what your base line is and guide how you allocate new revenues during prosperous times. It prevents core growth of government and recognizes unpredictable revenue sources for what they are.

Much of the public discussion recently has been about whether Boeing will develop assembly facilities in another state for the Dreamliner. This is an easy issue to address. If you were a member of the management team at Boeing, how would you respond to a workforce that refuses to acknowledge the peril the company suffers as the result of a labor dispute or a government that fails to understand the impact of unreasonable L& I and Employment Security rates? There is no doubt that each of us would look to develop alternatives for the future. The company cannot be held hostage by either of them. If the net result is that the company leaves the state over time, it should not be surprising. If you believe keeping the Boeing Company is a high priority for our county, you need to demonstrate that by supporting Steve Dana.

For Snohomish County, Boeing is a big gorilla, but not the only one. Other businesses suffer from the same issues that might cause them to leave as well. Our responsibility as leaders is to develop a tax structure for all businesses that is competitive with other parts of the country and even the world. Other than agriculture products that grow in our unique climate conditions, manufacturers can locate where market force conditions can be considered. If our leaders fail to develop a strategy to address this issue, our county and state will be reduced to a service sector economy catering to a huge public sector government with no tax base; in an economic death spiral.
As much as we would like to blame someone else for our predicament, we have passed the point for blame. We all know how we got here.

This election is not about the past, it’s about the future and where we want to lead our county tomorrow. The choice you make in this county council election can either turn the ship of state back to safe harbor and the American way or further out into the storm of Socialism.

For Steve Dana, the core issues of the campaign are;

1. Jobs: Private Sector Job creation through supporting Economic Development initiatives. Nearly all of government’s funding comes from the private sector. Businesses create jobs that create the economy. Working to remove regulatory obstacles to private sector investment for business is one of my highest priorities. Historically, prosperity for America only comes when government has cleared the way for private businesses to be innovative and responsive to the needs of our country.

2. Restraining the Growth of Government: County Government has doubled in size in the past 20 years. Taxes and fees have exploded, county employment has skyrocketed and in spite of technology investments, productivity gains have not. Getting more done with less resources is what we do in the private sector. President Ronald Reagan was on the right track when he said “Government can’t solve the problem! Government is the problem!”

3. Land Use Policy and Property Rights: Traffic congestion from development inside and outside of urban growth areas has significantly impacted quality of life for all of us. “Concurrence” is the term that describes having adequate roads in place before development arrives rather than after. As the urbanized parts of the county annex into cities, development in rural districts will create conflict between interest groups that will need even handed reconciliation.

4. Financial Management: Funding necessary government functions will become critical as the tax base shrinks from annexations and other changes to the economy. Adopting conservative fiscal policies during these difficult times will prevent us from getting back on the spending band wagon as the economy improves.

5. Balanced Environmental Policy: Green Initiatives to address Global Warming/Climate Change will cost taxpayers a fortune without measurable benefits. Snohomish County Critical Areas regulations don’t give enough consideration to property owners and their rights. People and property owners should be protected from unreasonable government regulation. One of the founding principles of our country has been that we be free from unreasonable government interference in our lives.

From a political perspective, county elections are about picking a governing philosophy rather than a political party. If you want a bigger government that is more controlling, takes your property rights and your tax dollars while changing your behavior to make you comply; vote for the Democrat. If you want a smaller government that is less intrusive in your life that focuses on essential services and gives us fair value for our taxes paid vote for Steve Dana, the Republican.

My fellow Republican candidate from Arlington, the honorable John Koster indicated in a campaign outreach letter that he is the lone conservative on the county council and as such cannot solve the problems there single-handedly. I couldn’t concur more. John has been fighting the good fight, but victory is not possible without help. I am the candidate that can assist John Koster in his ongoing struggle. I have the tools, the knowledge and the integrity to stand with conservatives for today and on into the future.

In that regard, there have been questions raised within the Republican Party about whether I am as Republican as the next person. I guess that will be up to each of you to decide. My support of business, property rights, smaller government, lower taxes, and fair application of environmental regulations certainly compares favorably with any Republican in recent memory and sets me apart from any Democrat I know of. As Councilmember Koster said in his letter, “… we vote for a person – not a party. Character is still paramount.” I agree with Mr. Koster and offer my history in my community as a business owner, elected official and community service advocate as a testament to my character. My record as an elected official attests to my leadership and ability to work collaboratively with elected officials from all political persuasions across the whole county.

I face a struggle greater than John Koster in this election since I am a challenger rather than an incumbent. The entrenched opposition has the advantage of being elected twice already, but he also has been beaten once. He has the environmental community and the labor unions supporting him because they know he supports their causes. If those are your issues, Dave is your guy. If you think the rest of us need a voice in government, then you need to take action now to support Steve Dana with your dollars and any other way you can. Campaigning is really expensive.

I do not come to this election with either an ax to grind or at the bidding of any special interest group. My record and reputation was built upon respect for others with different viewpoints and fair consideration of the facts. I am the candidate John Koster was referring to when he quoted Edmund Burke “The only way I know for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Then he followed with “Are there enough good men left? If there are, will they do something… and soon?” As a Republican, I am stepping forward to serve my community, my party and everyone that holds our shared values in high regard.

“Leadership” is taking the tools you are given coupled with courage of conviction to step out in front of the issues to offer ideas and solutions to problems without regard for personal safety. Our country, state, county and cities have suffered greatly because of elected officials who fail to lead for fear of losing the next election. I got into this campaign because people asked “where are our leaders when we need them?”

I am the man stepping forward with the skills, the experience, the integrity and the character to do my part. The question is whether you will do your part by helping me get elected to help John Koster. The choice is yours! Please help me wage this battle so I can fight alongside John Koster to protect your interests. I would appreciate your support!

Tags:
July 2, 2009

Boeing is the Backbone of our County Economy!

by Steve Dana

Steve Dana’s Highest Priority

PROTECTING JOBS AND HOME VALUES BY KEEPING BOEING IN EVERETT!

I am disappointed and angered that the Snohomish County Council doesn’t have a “sense of urgency” about keeping Boeing building airplanes in Everett. If there is one issue that should be on their agenda, this is it!

If there was ever a failure of leadership in Snohomish County, it would be the county council’s apparent indifference to a Boeing exit! Aaron Reardon’s meager efforts cannot succeed alone.

The value of Boeing to the county economy cannot be overstated; every job at Boeing creates three other jobs so every one of us is affected by what happens there. From grocery stores to car dealers; from construction workers to baristas at Starbucks, all of us are affected by Boeing.

Home values plummeted following the mortgage industry collapse. Many of us saw our home value slashed by 20% or more in the past year. Real Estate professionals agree we will suffer similar losses again if Boeing decides to invest elsewhere. County government must do its’ part to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Last fall, Boeing Commercial CEO Scott Carson reminded us that for businesses “Location is a choice.” “Public policies — taxes, education and workforce training, regulation, transportation corridors — play a critical role in choice.”
http://www.researchcouncil.org/washace-publications/Boeing%20Impact%20Final.pdf

In 2002 Snohomish County adopted an Economic Stimulus Plan that outlined a strategy to help businesses like Boeing overcome obstacles to competitiveness; apparently that plan is not consistent with the vision for the county of current elected officials.
http://www.co.snohomish.wa.us/documents/Departments/Council/economic_stimulus2002.pdf

It’s time to recommit to that plan so our jobs and home values will be secure for our children and grandchildren. Supporting the Boeing Company and other private sector businesses is the best investment our county can make.

Steve Dana is committed to making Everett the only choice for Boeing!
SNOHOMISH COUNTY WILL BE A GHOST TOWN IF WE FAIL TO KEEP BOEING INVESTING IN EVERETT!

June 7, 2009

In Politics, Cash is King. Show me the Money!

by Steve Dana

The field has suddenly gotten crowded in our county council race. Current Lake Stevens mayor, Vern Little filed to run against Somers and me then former Independent candidate Greg Stephens also filed. Stephens was the guy that got into the race with Somers and Sax and drew enough votes away from Sax that Somers could win. Stephens now prefers Republican to Independent. We now have three Republicans and one Democrat. I’m not sure what Jerry Cornfield meant a couple months ago when he asked whether I was the best the Republican Party could muster. Cornfield must have been referring to Vern and/or Greg as the better candidates. Which Republicans was he referring to anyway?

The up-side of this development is that we can get a handle on our weaknesses and our strengths at a point in the campaign where we can re-tool for the general or be out of the race without spending the fortune it will take to compete in November.

I suspect that Vern will get a big infusion of cash to jump start his campaign. The interests that question my viability will buy Vern whatever advantage they can. We all know that in politics, cash is king. I will continue to march with my campaign at the grass roots. How many times have you heard of a Republican doing a grass roots campaign?

I was advised this morning by a prominent Republican that even if he pitched in with my campaign I would still be beaten by ten percentage points because I had no money, I had no base and I had no experience in partisan politics. I must be one really bad candidate. He did say that I was a nice guy. He also conceded that if I were elected I would do a great job, but I guess that doesn’t count for much.

That same prominent Republican recently sponsored a fund raiser for Somers, the Democrat. I guess he is covering his bases. You do have to wonder what is going on when prominent Republicans are raising money for Dave. It makes me speculate about the quid pro quo. What did Somers have to give to get these guys to sponsor a fund raiser for him? Wasn’t there something out there about making a deal with the devil?

Even though I didn’t like to hear it, that Republican was right when he said I had no money and I had no partisan political experience. He was not right when he said I had no base. My base is huge; it’s just difficult to get them motivated. My challenge between now and August 1 is to get my message out to the voters without a big pot of cash. That is where you all fit in. You didn’t realize this blog was interactive. I can raise fifty thousand dollars by motivating sixty guys to give $800 each or five hundred guys to give $100. Oh, all right, I will take fifty bucks from a thousand guys. But I need your help lining up those thousand guys. You know what they say; a journey of a thousand contributions begins with a single check.

After I finish first or second in the primary, my electability should change.

In the mean time, feel free to throw money at my campaign. And encourage all your friends to do the same. These days everything is about networking. Sharing my message with as many people as you can would help immeasurably.

The political wizard said I can’t win if I don’t motivate my base. You can’t see it, but I am motivating, or is it just groveling?

My address is:
Steve Dana for County Council
1101 Avenue D Ste C-102 PMB 132
Snohomish, WA 98290

Tags:
May 30, 2009

Trash Talk about Trash!

by Steve Dana

The city of Bothell will annex another chunk of unincorporated Snohomish County into their city later this year. For many years, we argued about whether cities should annex. Snohomish County was made the keeper of the annexation approval stamp and they were very stingy with it. Most annexations are not controversial in the way this Bothell one is.

We are not arguing the merits of the annexation. Everyone agrees the designated land is urban and belongs in a city. (I could argue it belongs in a different city, but that piece will have to wait for another day) The controversy embroiling this annexation is about garbage.

Who could think Snohomish County and Bothell would be fighting over garbage? Not who has to take it, but who gets to take it. Garbage is the prize!

Garbage is almost a commodity. Unlike normal perishable commodities that get ripe then spoil, garbage is already over the edge and if it isn’t hauled away, it then gets ripe.

For most of us, we put out the can on Monday morning and when we come home after work, the trash is gone and we start over. Who gives it any thought?

Well, let me tell you, there are folks out there that covet your garbage.

Isn’t it ironic, our government has been preaching that we reduce waste and recycle more and now we hear that they actually want us to produce more garbage? Which is it, more garbage or less garbage?

In Seattle they have garbage police to make sure you don’t put stuff in the garbage that is recyclable. You can be fined for dumping garbage into the garbage if it is recyclable garbage. There is something wrong with that!

If you buy into the recycling argument, then it seems to me the goal is to reduce garbage.

I have been a proponent of handling our waste products locally through a combination of recycling and incineration with co-generation for electricity. Environmentalists complain about the pollution going into the air, but they appear to be okay with the pollution going into the ground.

If there is a comprehensive look at the recycling industry so we can understand what market forces affect them during fluctuations, I could be more enthusiastic about the reality of recycling. My limited experience in dealing with recyclers during my years on the Snohomish City Council did not build confidence that the industry was performing as we were led to believe it was.

In principle, I’m okay with recycling, but the responsibility for collecting, separating and disposing of the stuff should be the garbage handler’s. Rather than making citizens separate their trash, make the whole process a private sector business opportunity. Then I would take it a step further and make it our goal to eliminate land-fill garbage completely. Recycle everything!

We currently pay about $100 per ton to handle solid waste that is shipped by train to some other location where it is buried in an environment that does not promote bio-degrading. That stuff will be in that land-fill for a thousand years. All our household trash encapsulated in our little plastic garbage bags protecting our kitchen floors, but at what cost?

The fact that two counties are fighting over who will get the Snohomish County part of Bothell’s collected trash leads me to believe that reducing waste into the land fill is not a goal of either county.

There are several issues that need resolution here.
1. Is Snohomish County in the garbage collection business because the private sector is unable to handle the job? What are the economic impacts of privatizing the garbage business for the county and for consumers?
2. As a part of our “Green” plan, shouldn’t we be thinking about land-fill liabilities we create? Just because the land-fill is in another county doesn’t mean we are not responsible. This is like wetland mitigation banks that allow urbanites to salve their guilt by paying someone else to feel their pain.
3. If Recycling is a goal for our county, where do we find policies that outline WHO will do WHAT and WHY? If recycling is a county goal, why?
4. Recycling should have an economic as well as an environmental justification. Are there markets for waste stream by-products? If we require that garbage be separated then ship it to the land fill because there is no market, why did we separate?
5. Is changing citizen behavior with recycling a responsibility we want government to assume? Do we want government in the business of changing our behavior? Is the vision of the recycling police the one you want for your neighborhood? What else are they monitoring as they check your trash?

In the near term, the issue of garbage collection in Bothell needs resolution. Even though I don’t believe we should be in the business, we are. Our current county solid waste system is predicated on a sustained volume of product. If we lose money by allowing the trash to be diverted to King County then I say we keep all Snohomish County trash in Snohomish County. I would make it a condition of the annexation that the garbage be collected in our system.

Then I would step back and look at the issues enumerated above. The county should not be in the solid waste business and recycling needs to work on more than one level. There are some real issues to be sorted out here. Let’s start with recycling!