I don’t think there is a Diplomacy 101 class that will prepare you to deal with crises like we are having in Egypt, North Africa and the Islamic countries east to Saudi Arabia so it’s understandable that President Obama’s diplomatic A-Team are not All Stars; some wouldn’t even make varsity. I guess that since there weren’t any proven diplomats in the Clinton Administration there weren’t any Obama could bring back onto the current team except lightweights.
Like every President, Obama will be judged years later on how he and his team deal with this whole affair. I don’t think there is a right answer and a wrong answer when you have to make decisions in the moment with the information available at your disposal in that moment until time passes and in hind sight we can judge right and wrong. (It won’t keep us from second guessing him though.)
It’s unfortunate that our states-people are having to learn on the job that what we say matters on the world stage. If it weren’t so important in the politics of the world, it would be comical watching James Clapper and Leon Panetta fumble with their testimony before Congress.
They want so much to say that the Muslim Brotherhood is a harmless organization with only a few bad apple terrorists on their fringe because that fits their political goals, but the truth is the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization with a few harmless peaceniks on their fringe. How do Clapper and Panetta justify taking a paycheck for such incompetence.
If there wasn’t so much evidence that refutes their testimony we would normally accept their testimony as the gospel and that would be dangerous. Thank God that these guys are so obviously incompetent or creatively prevaricating that they have no credibility what-so-ever.
The Obama Team is not winning any points for diplomacy after their first two years in office and this Egypt crisis does not bode well for the next two years. I hope our country survives.
In the interest of full disclosure, I did not take that diplomacy class either but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
How Will Light Rail Come to Snohomish County?
by Steve DanaI had reason to be at SeaTac Airport this week. The landscape there is still evolving with the completion of the light rail station there. It got me thinking about how light rail would wend its way into Snohomish County.
I know light rail is not expected in our county for another decade or more, but I was thinking about land-use decisions we should be making in our county to be ready when our day finally arrives.
The last I heard, the plan was to serve Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood but what does that mean?
Long range planning for a project like this requires that we establish likely routes so we can begin right-of-way acquisition and upgrades to our comprehensive plan that will steer the right kind of development into the vicinity that will increase population density to a point where light rail begins to make sense.
The Urban Center concept would work for the area around a light rail stop; High Rise development that incorporates shopping, professional services, residential units and adequate parking for commuters who live away from transit lines.
Think about a light rail station in the middle of Bellevue Square or the Mall of America.
The Sound Transit – North Link plan calls for an underground station between NE 45th Street and NE 43rd Street on Brooklyn Avenue in the University District; heading north from the U District in a tunnel to a station at 65th NE and Roosevelt Ave then over to the I-5 Freeway and up to the Northgate Transit Station south of the Mall. The train comes out of the tunnel just north of NE 85th Street and runs on the surface a short distance then elevated to the Northgate Station.
The North Link is scheduled to start in 2012 so it would be a good idea for us to start talking about where the line will go when it leaves Northgate.
If the decisions about Sound Transit are made in cooperation with the communities to be served, then I would assume there is a process in place to gather input, I just can’t find it.
The Puget Sound Regional Council’s Transportation 2040 shows light rail in the Alderwood Mall vicinity but is clearly not a priority for them.
Interestingly, PSRC also shows Commuter Rail serving the Woodinville – Snohomish Corridor but it doesn’t show any extension of rail service north of Snohomish.
Wouldn’t that be a good idea if we are engineering projects along SR-9 to Arlington? I have argued that we should be developing alternative rail capacity as a back-up to the main line that runs along the water. Since there are frequent landslides during the rainy season, having alternatives for both freight and commuter service might be a good idea. But what do I know?
Posted in Snohomish County Political Commentary | Leave a Comment »