I was sitting in church last week in my normal spot, second from the back row because I’m not a back bencher. You cannot avoid overhearing what people around you are saying when you are sitting in church.
There was a group of older ladies talking about their dismay and disappointment with the way kids are these days but how happy they were knowing that their children were raised in the church so they weren’t “that way”.
I couldn’t help but speculate how their kids were. But then it occurred to me that even though their kids were raised in the church, they were citizens of the world and away from the church, their kids had to compete with other kids who didn’t have the benefit of Christian teaching. And even then, temptations of the world are the biggest magnet for pulling kids raised in the church away and into the secular world. That learning the lessons in Sunday School might expose you to God’s messages, but that alone didn’t prevent other “preachers” from offering competing ideas.
So who are those other preachers? Well, our public school system is the place we send our kids to learn. So the preachers who are in the pulpit most of your kid’s life are teachers in whatever school your kids attend. If your kids go to Sunday School on Sunday then go to public schools Monday through Friday, which one do you think will have the greater influence?
That’s right, the teachers in the public schools have your kid’s attention five or six or seven hours during the day, five days per week. Under ideal circumstances, those teachers are exposing the class to Reading, Writing and Arithmetic along with Science, History and Social Studies. If you teach a kid to read, that child can accomplish almost anything. If you can’t read, you will be challenged to learn any of the other essentials. If you can read, you can teach yourself almost anything. If the public school system has one mission, it’s to teach kids to read. And yet, the failure rate for elementary school age children in learning to read has never been higher than today.
This little rant is one I often land on. If education has one vital function, it’s to teach reading and reading is the heart of our body of learning. Give a kid a weak heart and he will be handicapped the rest of his life.
Because I am a pundit, I wanted to insert myself into that conversation in church, but I did not. I didn’t have to bite my tongue, I just sat there silently.
Kids raised in the church on Sunday and in a Christian school during the week have a better chance of being a competent reader than kids in public schools because in my view, if you can’t read, you can’t read your Bible. But being in a Christian school doesn’t guarantee a Christian education.
Who makes the decision about who is teaching our kids and what they are being taught matters. The people in decision making positions decide who and what will be taught. So in your circle of influence, who is making those decisions? Do you know the names of your school board members? Do you know any of them personally? How about the principal at your kid’s elementary school? How about your kid’s teacher?
You put your kids into the care of these people and you probably don’t know enough about them to say with confidence they are teaching my kids the things they will need to know to be successful in the world or conversely, that they are not teaching your kids things that will undermine the values you think are important in your family.
I have to admit, today, I do not know the names of the school board members in our school district. My daughter and her kids are all well past public school age. I will say that when they were in school I did know most of the people in those positions.
Not everyone knows that typically, your public school district is the largest employer and business entity in your community.
When I shot my mouth off in 1987 and was critical of the city, I ran for city council because I thought my ideas made more sense than the ones I saw coming out of city hall. It could just as easily been a run for the school board.
I saw my local government heading in the wrong direction and rather than staying quiet, I spoke up and ran for office. I was advised by people I respect to stay quiet because I was in business in town. I answered with a typical STEVE HAS SOMETHING TO SAY answer. “The reason we are in this pickle today is because we stayed quiet and the ones now making the decisions have their own agenda.”
And that is my core message in everything I write about. The decisions that affect every aspect of our lives are made by the people at the table or the ones out in front. From 1987 until 2021, I served in some capacity governing the city of Snohomish Washington. Not because I they couldn’t get someone else to do it, but because the other people wanting the job had a different agenda than mine.
I put my business and my family at risk because I believed serving is our obligation and because a number of the other people wanting the jobs believed in different principles.
I recently wrote about Capitalism vs Progressivism. I am the Capitalist, they are the Progressives. A city’s first obligation is public safety. If people are not safe, what other function can a city provide that makes living there worth the risk? For all my years in government, I prioritized economic development because I understood that services like public safety (cops and firefighters) are paid for with taxes and in our state, sales taxes coming to the city are the life blood of spending. Are you with me? I’m the Capitalist on the council. I’m focused on making money for the city. Many of my council colleagues were the Progressives. All they could care about was how to spend the money. Sadly today, nearly all the council members are Progressives.
I ran for office because I thought, If not me, then who? Remember, I’m a near back bencher so that little pearl resonated with me. Send me Lord.
The most impactful lesson I learned during my thirty-four years of public service was the importance of showing up, to serve, to criticize and offer alternatives or to support the ones that do.
I started this essay today talking about learning to read and reading our Bibles and who is teaching our kids. If I had been motivated to run for school board rather than city council, my life would be different today and my school district would be different as well. The people sitting in those school board seats have a lot to do with what your kids are taught and what they are not taught. The quality of education in our country is determined by the ones who show up; to run for school board, to serve in the PTA to serve as a volunteer or teacher’s aid. Multiply that obligation by the number of school districts in the state or the country and you will see the scope of the job. But the lesson wasn’t a generic who, it was “will it be YOU?”
I don’t want to be too churchy in this, but one of every pastor’s core messages is “Nobody can do everything, but Everybody can do something.” There is an obligation to serve in some capacity in our churches, our schools, our cities, counties and states. Nobody is asking you to serve thirty-four years like I did, but you should do your compulsory duty to serve for a few years, even if it’s only during the years when your own kids are in school.
The decisions about what your kids are being taught are made by people who believe things differently than you do. Are you really surprised when you find out that the kids can’t read, or write, or do arithmetic? When I was in the restaurant business, I added a simple third grade math test to every job application I passed out to kids applying for work in my restaurant. If they couldn’t do third grade math as seventeen year old juniors in high school, I couldn’t hire them. My employees needed to know how to read and do simple math. And sadly, there were a disappointing number of kids who couldn’t fill out either side of the application.
The ones that showed up made the decisions about which kids were left behind. Or which ones were dragged along even though they couldn’t read.
Our country today is over run by almost fifty years of “graduates” from the public education system that cannot read or do simple math. Our education system is cranking out millions of kids heading off to college that cannot read, write a complete sentence or work a simple logic problem.
We get what we settle for. I was never willing to settle for less because that was all the system required.
If you wonder how you kid will fare in the world with the poor quality of her education, ask yourself one question, “What was MY contribution to a successful outcome for my child?”
Our school systems are screwed because we left the decisions to other people that showed up. Our city governments, county governments, state governments and our federal government are screwed up because most of us left the decisions to other people who showed up and they got their way and your kids got shafted.
We as a people don’t even bother to participate at the level of voting for the candidates who run for office. You don’t have to commit for four years, you just have to show up on election day and you won’t even do that.
Those ladies in that group at church don’t realize the ripples on the pools of their lives have such profound effects on their own kids and the others. We get what we deserve if we don’t bother to serve.
Get off your butts and pitch in doing something for the betterment of your community. Not only will it serve the now, it will serve the future by modeling positive behavior for your kids who are more likely to serve if they have a parent who served.
I actually wrote a book about public service and why some serve and others do not. It will be coming out here on my Substack in 2027.
I also have an essay I’m writing about how important education and participation in the system protect and promote liberty and freedom in America.
FIND ME FOR LONG FORM PUNDITRY AT SUBSTACK AS WELL http://www.theteapartypundit.substack.com/
No Loss for Words 
The Oath We Take… and the One We Keep
by Steve DanaThere was a time when an oath meant something. Not just the words. Not just the ceremony. The weight of it.
You stood, you raised your right hand, and you spoke words that bound you—not only to the people in front of you, but to something higher. Whether you were a man of deep faith or simply a person of conscience, you understood that you had crossed a line. You were no longer just a private citizen. You had made a commitment. And that commitment came with expectations.
I remember taking that oath. More than once.
Different terms. Different seasons of life. But the same words. The same promise: to faithfully execute the duties of the office, to support and defend the Constitution, and yes—for many of us—to do so “so help me God.”
That last phrase mattered to me. It wasn’t filler. It wasn’t tradition for tradition’s sake. It was a reminder that my word was not just given—it was witnessed.
And that changes a person. Or at least, it used to.
Today, I find myself asking a simple question: what exactly does an oath mean anymore? Because in our public life, we have become very good at requiring the oath… and not nearly as good at expecting anything from it.
In the biblical sense, an oath was never casual. It was a covenant. You did not invoke God’s name lightly, because to do so falsely was to place yourself under judgment. Your word was your bond, and your bond was tied to your standing before God. That kind of thinking produces a certain kind of person—careful, deliberate, aware that promises are not tools but commitments.
Our Bible Study Fellowship group is studying the book of Nehemiah chapter 10 this week. I was struck by the seriousness of the Jews as they swore an oath to God accompanied by a penalty for failing to honor the oath.
In Nehemiah 10 verse “29 all these now join their fellow Israelites the nobles, and bind themselves with a curse and an oath to follow the Law of God given through Moses the servant of God and to obey carefully all the commands, regulations and decrees of the Lord our Lord.”
It was that penalty part that got my attention. We do solemnly swear, under penalty of perjury as it says when you sit as a witness in a legal proceeding. Under penalty of criminal indictment.
What happened to that penalty part with our elected officials?
Over time, that part faded right off the paper.
In our constitutional system, the oath became less about a covenant with God and more about a commitment to a framework—the rule of law, the Constitution, the structure of government itself. That was not a step down. It was, in many ways, a step toward unity in a diverse nation. You didn’t have to share the same theology, but you did have to agree on the same foundation.
Fair enough. But something subtle happened along the way. We kept the words, but we lost the weight.
Today, an oath of office is required before an official can assume power. Refuse to take it, and you don’t get the job. The system is very clear about that. No oath, no authority. The line is sharp, and it is enforced.
But once the oath is taken? That’s where things get… flexible.
If you are testifying in a trial, lying will get you in jail. If you are a politician, lying will get you re-elected.
There is no law that says, “You have violated your oath, therefore you are guilty.” Instead, we rely on a patchwork of enforcement—criminal law if a statute is broken, impeachment if political will exists, elections if voters are paying attention. The oath itself becomes more of a reference point than a standard of judgment.
And so we arrive at a strange place.
An elected official can stand before the public, swear to uphold the Constitution, and then—through action or inaction—ignore, reinterpret, or selectively apply it in ways that would have once been unthinkable. As long as those actions fall within the gray areas of law or politics, the oath itself offers no direct consequence.
The promise is made. The accountability is optional.
Now, to be fair, we live in a complex society. Not every disagreement is a violation. Not every policy choice is a betrayal. Reasonable people can—and should—debate how best to uphold the Constitution and the laws of this country.
But that’s not what troubles me. What troubles me is something deeper.
It’s the growing sense that the oath has become a formality rather than a boundary. That it is something we say to gain office, not something we carry once we have it. That the words are recited, but not necessarily believed.
And that brings us back to the heart of the matter.
An oath is only as strong as the person taking it.
If a man believes he is accountable—to God, to the law, to his own conscience—then the oath has force. It shapes his decisions. It restrains him when it should. It guides him when the path is unclear.
But if he believes he is accountable only to circumstance, or power, or convenience… then the oath becomes little more than a step in the process. A box to check. A sentence to recite.
We have built a system that insists upon the taking of the oath. But have we built a culture that insists upon keeping it? That’s a harder question.
Because laws can only do so much. Courts can only reach so far. Elections, as important as they are, come long after the decisions have been made. In the end, the strength of an oath rests not in the enforcement mechanism, but in the character of the one who speaks it.
That may not be a satisfying answer in an age that looks for systems to solve every problem. But it is an honest one.
We cannot legislate integrity. We can only expect it. And that expectation begins with us.
If we, as citizens, treat the oath as ceremonial, we should not be surprised when those we elect do the same. If we reward results over principles, power over fidelity, outcomes over process, then the oath will continue to fade into the background.
But if we begin to ask different questions—if we begin to look not just at what our elected officials promise, but how they govern once in office—then perhaps the oath can recover some of its meaning.
Not because it is enforced more harshly. But because it is taken more seriously.
So here is the question we ought to be asking ourselves: “When an elected official raises their hand and swears to support and defend the Constitution… do we expect them to live that oath?”
Or have we become comfortable with simply hearing them say it?
Because the answer to that question may tell us less about our leaders… and more about us.
Posted in Ethics and Integrity, Faith, Partisan Politics, Political commentary, Social Commentary | Leave a Comment »