Archive for ‘Political commentary’

June 15, 2012

Is Middle Class Second Class?

by Steve Dana

One of the big political arguments swirling again this season is “how do we rebuild and restore the Middle Class?”

The next question for me is “what income range is considered Middle Class?”

I’m no economist but I think of Boeing Machinists as being Middle Class type folks.  I would guess their incomes range from $40,000 per year to $80,000 per year or roughly $20/hour to $40/hour.  And even though they are highly trained, many of them are not college educated.

So for the sake of my argument that is how I will define Middle Class. 

Once you establish the income range you just look around for the jobs that pay that kind of money.  Or maybe you look for the jobs that used to pay that kind of money and follow that with where did those jobs go?

As a resident of the Puget Sound region in Washington State Boeing is a big part of our economy.  For many years it was the only game in town.  Fortunately we lucked out when Bill Gates and Paul Allen decided to keep Microsoft local, Howard Schultz opened Starbucks in Seattle; and again when Jeff Bezos headquartered Amazon in town.

So we have four very different businesses that produce and incredible amount of wealth in the region with very different operating models.  One that manufactures a product, one that produces a digital product and two that provide services.

Without a college degree in computer science or business management, most remaining Microsoft employees struggle to make it into the middle class.  The bulk of the Amazon and Starbucks employees also just bump the bottom of the range at best.

What is missing is the manufacturing jobs like Boeing offers.  And what we know about Boeing is that they are also looking to reduce the cost of their workforce as well by opening factories in locations where the cost of labor is lower.

Is anyone surprised that I have an opinion about this dilemma?

Since our government bought into the “world economy” argument the American manufacturing sector has been withering and along with it the Middle Class.

The jobs most often associated with the Middle Class in the past were family wage factory jobs that have been shipped over seas to build up the economies of our trading partners.  The adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA signaled the exit of many manufacturing jobs to Mexico.  American participation in World Trade organizations encourage relocation of previously American jobs to third world economies to bolster those countries as trading partners but at the expense of American manufacturing jobs.

In most cases the jobs that go overseas are jobs that require training but not significant education.

The jobs that remain here are the ones that are tied to raw materials or require a highly trained and educated workforce; and even those raw materials jobs are at risk as the government is regulating many of them out of existence.

By today’s standards the Middle Class jobs are the public sector employers like governments and school systems.  Locally we have city and county governments, we have Policemen, Fire Fighters and Public Works employees and at the state and federal levels we have the Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, Department of Ecology, Department of Education…..yadayadayada.  Is it any wonder that the Middle Class has changed so dramatically?

The Middle Class swapped private sector jobs that produced the highest standard of living and best quality products in the world for public sector jobs that suck up the resources of society and produce nothing but a bill.

The Middle Class today is the Bureaucrat Class with the Service Sector groveling for a handout.

The cost of government skyrocketed at every level while the private sector industries our country was famous for have fled.  Even a country boy like me could see this as it was happening but the rationale for world trade was too deep for me to grasp.

Whether it’s big business or big government, both political parties still champion the world trade argument even though it sells American workers down the river.  There is no safe haven with either the Democrats or Republicans.

If you really want to know what happened to the Middle Class look at China where economic development is producing record numbers of millionaires even in this depressed economy.  Our Middle Class moved overseas!

If our goal is to return America to the prosperity we enjoyed for many years after WW2 we have to examine what our government did to cause the exodus and systematically reverse it.  We will also have to analyze the political ramifications to our trading partners and make value judgments.  Bringing the private sector Middle Class back to America will have international implications.

June 1, 2012

Insurance is the Devil of our Society!

by Steve Dana

I’ve come to the conclusion that INSURANCE is the root of most evil in our country today.  In my view, INSURANCE and LAWYERS together are to blame for most of what’s wrong. 

Think about how many insurance pools affect your life.  At home you have your home owner’s liability policy, your fire insurance policy and your auto policies covering your liability and your casualty loss.  If you have a mortgage, you probably have mortgage insurance.  If you are prudent you may have life insurance.

At work you are covered by Worker’s Compensation through Department of Labor and Industries and Employment Security (Unemployment Insurance) both paid mostly by your employer.

Increasingly, Health Care Insurance has come to dominate our lives.  Whether you pay for it individually or your employer pays for it, Health Care Insurance is becoming the most insidious form of insurance in our lives.

For a long time the discussion was focused on the “health care” part of the deal.  The thought was that the cost of care was driven by health care providers.  Then when we looked closer we saw that insurance companies were entrenched in the businesses of those providers it wasn’t about the quality of the care, it was only about what the insurance company would pay. 

Who hasn’t heard about Mal-Practice and Business Liability insurance for the doctors, the clinics and the hospitals?  It isn’t just the medical related businesses that are affected though; nearly every profession is impacted by Insurance policies.

The Lawyers compound the need for insurance because if someone fails to perform as they agreed in their insurance policy, an ambulance chaser, personal injury, mal-practice attorney will sue you and the insurance company for the failure.  Threatened with the loss of your stuff, you toe the line.

Insurance companies have been changing our behavior for many years.  Life insurance companies did it with smoking.  Auto insurance companies did it with seat belts and motor cycle helmets. 

If you engage in behavior they decide is “risky” your rates go up or your policy is cancelled.  And that is the central issue of this whole piece.

I guess the other component is not canceling your policy but reducing your benefits; which is happening everywhere we look.

This week, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg suggested that sugared soft drinks larger than 16 ounces should be outlawed in New York City, citing the cost of health care paid by our health insurance carriers as the justification.  Obese people who are covered get subsidized health care because they are not as healthy as skinnier folks.  (Think about how far an idiot could extend that logic.)

The mayor focuses on how your personal bad choices affect insurance premiums paid by everyone.  Last time it was trans fats in the cooking oil used by restaurants.  Can you see how INSURANCE is becoming the dominant factor in our lives?

Insurance is the binding force that the government uses to change your behavior.  By making coverage mandatory you increase the size of the money pool supposedly making the unit cost less while giving the insurance company the leverage over the service providers to reduce their reimbursement rate.

Certainly the Supreme Court’s pending decision on Obamacare will be the deciding factor in whether the government and the insurance companies can require that you buy their insurance and accept their prescribed level of care without competition in the market.  It will also determine whether a doctor can set the price for his services or whether the insurance companies will have a strangle-hold on all the actual medical providers.

Don’t get me started about Medicare.  We supposedly paid into a pool that should have compounded and grown into a huge fund that would pay for our medical costs when we retired.  Unfortunately the government raided the fund and left it with a bunch of IOU’s so the actual cost of care today has to be paid out of current revenue.

Insurance companies will be the downfall of our society if the government requires that we all be covered for all perils.

Lawyers will be the enforcers since they will either sue you or threaten to sue you for whatever meager possessions the government allows you to have.

No doubt I would be in favor of “tort reform” limiting the dollar amount that could be awarded in a mal-practice or liability trial and providing that the plaintiff be held financially liable for the cost incurred by the defendant if the defendant is found to be not guilty.

Do I sound a little edgy?  Good!

May 26, 2012

Do Nothing, Done Nothing

by Steve Dana

Considering the fact that prior to being elected President, Barrack Obama hardly had a job and quite possibly never even worked for a “for profit” company, he seems mighty confident in criticizing Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s record of achievement let alone his net jobs created record at Bain Capital.

The President stood there this week talking about how Romney’s work experiences from Bain Capital to the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics to Governor of Massachusetts hardly prepared him to be President of the United States.

President Obama seems to think his three years in office give him the experience edge even in light of the multiple failures of his administration.  He can legitimately claim credit for taking out bin Laden.  It took ten years to track him down and whether the Bush Administration contributed to the successful outcome or not, US military forces got the job done.  So is that the foundation of his Foreign Policy?  I read somewhere that right up to the hour before the mission was launched, Valerie Jarret was pushing Obama to abandon the mission.

The Arab Spring will prove to be significant in history as the time when America could have helped shape the evolution of free society in the Middle East but twiddled our thumbs as the opportunity faded away.

Then of course there is the Keystone Pipeline deal that had been through the approval process but needed Presidential approval that fell by the wayside in spite of the tens of thousands of jobs that would be created, the Solyndra half billion dollar debacle, the Fast and Furious guns to Mexico deal and the million dollar GSA junket to Vegas as examples of the President’s record of either personally deciding or delegating decisions to his appointees; example after example of failures of leadership to be sure but indicators also of a seriously incompetent or corrupt administration.

The President can talk about Romney’s record all he wants but how can he not expect us to compare Romney’s record to his own.

I’m still astonished with the way the General Motors deal was done.  Rather than letting the company enter some form of bankruptcy protection that would give the share holders and managers time to renegotiate debt payments and labor contracts the President instructed the government to seize the company, infuse it with enough federal stimulus money to get it through the financial crisis in exchange for high priority shares of stock rendering privately held shares relatively worthless while at the same time preserving the labor contracts that contributed so much to the underlying problems.  Is that even legal?

The President talks about how he is a job creator but in my mind, jobs that go away when the government money goes away are not jobs.  A real job is a man or woman creating something of value that someone else is willing to pay a market price for.  A real job sustains itself.

My final issue is the glut of regulation that flows out of the various federal departments.  Anyone who has ever been in business knows the impact changing regulations to a business plan.  If you don’t know how the Obama Health Care law will impact your business, it’s not likely that you will hire new employees unless your existing workers are being worked to the bone.  Unpredictable regulatory times are a huge impediment to job creation.  But it isn’t just the changes, it’s the volume of the regulations.  Thousands of pages of new federal regulations fly out of the Environmental Protection Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Education and the Department of Transportation each week.

President Obama needs to show us examples of how his buddy politics policies have created jobs since so many of his showcase plays have been unmitigated disasters.

The President should be careful how he characterizes Romney’s qualifications since his own record shows he clearly had no experience at anything except being a slick talking lawyer before he was elected.

I don’t believe Obama has ever served a full term of office in any job he ran for so his record as a legislator is bare as well.

If there were ever a “Do Nothing, Done Nothing!” president, Obama is tops.

March 9, 2012

Why is Covering the Spread So Important?

by Steve Dana

So I’m watching my friends on FOX News this afternoon and they were talking about an Auburn University basketball player suspected of point shaving.  One of the panelists asked about why it was such a big deal and Sheppard Smith made it sound as though something important was on the line when what is really on the line is the integrity of sports betting.

For many years the government prohibited sports betting on college sports but relaxed the regulation because of pressure from some high level interest group; I would imagine.

I would imagine it was the sports gambling industry.

So except for the gambling aspect, what is the big deal?  If a player by intention doesn’t play as hard as he normally does and his team suffers, the coach sits him on the bench or releases him from the team.  A coach’s job might be on the line for losing but federal authorities should never be involved.

We have a possible FBI investigation for a college basketball player supposedly failing to score up to his average when in neither of the games cited was the Auburn team favored to win so shaving wouldn’t be an issue unless the underdog was supposed to cover the spread and the shave was to prevent it.

If there is this kind of attention paid to college sports because of gambling, take the incentive off the table by reinstituting the ban on betting!  The government shouldn’t have a reason to investigate college athletics, there are too many other places where they should be focusing their investigations.  Lets’ get them working on the important stuff.