Archive for ‘Schools – Education’

September 5, 2026

We get what we deserve if we don’t bother to serve.

by Steve Dana

I was sitting in church last week in my normal spot, second from the back row because I’m not a back bencher.  You cannot avoid overhearing what people around you are saying when you are sitting in church.

There was a group of older ladies talking about their dismay and disappointment with the way kids are these days but how happy they were knowing that their children were raised in the church so they weren’t “that way”.

I couldn’t help but speculate how their kids were.  But then it occurred to me that even though their kids were raised in the church, they were citizens of the world and away from the church, their kids had to compete with other kids who didn’t have the benefit of Christian teaching.  And even then, temptations of the world are the biggest magnet for pulling kids raised in the church away and into the secular world.  That learning the lessons in Sunday School might expose you to God’s messages, but that alone didn’t prevent other “preachers” from offering competing ideas.

So who are those other preachers?  Well, our public school system is the place we send our kids to learn.  So the preachers who are in the pulpit most of your kid’s life are teachers in whatever school your kids attend.  If your kids go to Sunday School on Sunday then go to public schools Monday through Friday, which one do you think will have the greater influence?

That’s right, the teachers in the public schools have your kid’s attention five or six or seven hours during the day, five days per week.  Under ideal circumstances, those teachers are exposing the class to Reading, Writing and Arithmetic along with Science, History and Social Studies.  If you teach a kid to read, that child can accomplish almost anything.  If you can’t read, you will be challenged to learn any of the other essentials.  If you can read, you can teach yourself almost anything.  If the public school system has one mission, it’s to teach kids to read.  And yet, the failure rate for elementary school age children in learning to read has never been higher than today.

This little rant is one I often land on.  If education has one vital function, it’s to teach reading and reading is the heart of our body of learning.  Give a kid a weak heart and he will be handicapped the rest of his life.

Because I am a pundit, I wanted to insert myself into that conversation in church, but I did not.  I didn’t have to bite my tongue, I just sat there silently.

Kids raised in the church on Sunday and in a Christian school during the week have a better chance of being a competent reader than kids in public schools because in my view, if you can’t read, you can’t read your Bible.  But being in a Christian school doesn’t guarantee a Christian education.

Who makes the decision about who is teaching our kids and what they are being taught matters.  The people in decision making positions decide who and what will be taught.  So in your circle of influence, who is making those decisions?  Do you know the names of your school board members?  Do you know any of them personally?  How about the principal at your kid’s elementary school?  How about your kid’s teacher?

You put your kids into the care of these people and you probably don’t know enough about them to say with confidence they are teaching my kids the things they will need to know to be successful in the world or conversely, that they are not teaching your kids things that will undermine the values you think are important in your family.

I have to admit, today, I do not know the names of the school board members in our school district.  My daughter and her kids are all well past public school age.  I will say that when they were in school I did know most of the people in those positions.

Not everyone knows that typically, your public school district is the largest employer and business entity in your community. 

When I shot my mouth off in 1987 and was critical of the city, I ran for city council because I thought my ideas made more sense than the ones I saw coming out of city hall.  It could just as easily been a run for the school board.

I saw my local government heading in the wrong direction and rather than staying quiet, I spoke up and ran for office.  I was advised by people I respect to stay quiet because I was in business in town.  I answered with a typical STEVE HAS SOMETHING TO SAY answer.  “The reason we are in this pickle today is because we stayed quiet and the ones now making the decisions have their own agenda.”

And that is my core message in everything I write about.  The decisions that affect every aspect of our lives are made by the people at the table or the ones out in front.  From 1987 until 2021, I served in some capacity governing the city of Snohomish Washington.  Not because I they couldn’t get someone else to do it, but because the other people wanting the job had a different agenda than mine.

I put my business and my family at risk because I believed serving is our obligation and because a number of the other people wanting the jobs believed in different principles.

I recently wrote about Capitalism vs Progressivism.  I am the Capitalist, they are the Progressives.  A city’s first obligation is public safety.  If people are not safe, what other function can a city provide that makes living there worth the risk?  For all my years in government, I prioritized economic development because I understood that services like public safety (cops and firefighters) are paid for with taxes and in our state, sales taxes coming to the city are the life blood of spending.  Are you with me?  I’m the Capitalist on the council.  I’m focused on making money for the city.  Many of my council colleagues were the Progressives.  All they could care about was how to spend the money.  Sadly today, nearly all the council members are Progressives.

I ran for office because I thought, If not me, then who?  Remember, I’m a near back bencher so that little pearl resonated with me.  Send me Lord.

The most impactful lesson I learned during my thirty-four years of public service was the importance of showing up, to serve, to criticize and offer alternatives or to support the ones that do.

I started this essay today talking about learning to read and reading our Bibles and who is teaching our kids.  If I had been motivated to run for school board rather than city council, my life would be different today and my school district would be different as well.  The people sitting in those school board seats have a lot to do with what your kids are taught and what they are not taught.  The quality of education in our country is determined by the ones who show up; to run for school board, to serve in the PTA to serve as a volunteer or teacher’s aid.  Multiply that obligation by the number of school districts in the state or the country and you will see the scope of the job.  But the lesson wasn’t a generic who, it was “will it be YOU?”

I don’t want to be too churchy in this, but one of every pastor’s core messages is “Nobody can do everything, but Everybody can do something.”  There is an obligation to serve in some capacity in our churches, our schools, our cities, counties and states.  Nobody is asking you to serve thirty-four years like I did, but you should do your compulsory duty to serve for a few years, even if it’s only during the years when your own kids are in school.

The decisions about what your kids are being taught are made by people who believe things differently than you do.  Are you really surprised when you find out that the kids can’t read, or write, or do arithmetic?  When I was in the restaurant business, I added a simple third grade math test to every job application I passed out to kids applying for work in my restaurant.  If they couldn’t do third grade math as seventeen year old juniors in high school, I couldn’t hire them.  My employees needed to know how to read and do simple math.  And sadly, there were a disappointing number of kids who couldn’t fill out either side of the application.

The ones that showed up made the decisions about which kids were left behind.  Or which ones were dragged along even though they couldn’t read.

Our country today is over run by almost fifty years of “graduates” from the public education system that cannot read or do simple math.  Our education system is cranking out millions of kids heading off to college that cannot read, write a complete sentence or work a simple logic problem.

We get what we settle for.  I was never willing to settle for less because that was all the system required.

If you wonder how you kid will fare in the world with the poor quality of her education, ask yourself one question, “What was MY contribution to a successful outcome for my child?”

Our school systems are screwed because we left the decisions to other people that showed up.  Our city governments, county governments, state governments and our federal government are screwed up because most of us left the decisions to other people who showed up and they got their way and your kids got shafted.

We as a people don’t even bother to participate at the level of voting for the candidates who run for office.  You don’t have to commit for four years, you just have to show up on election day and you won’t even do that.

Those ladies in that group at church don’t realize the ripples on the pools of their lives have such profound effects on their own kids and the others.  We get what we deserve if we don’t bother to serve.

Get off your butts and pitch in doing something for the betterment of your community.  Not only will it serve the now, it will serve the future by modeling positive behavior for your kids who are more likely to serve if they have a parent who served.

I actually wrote a book about public service and why some serve and others do not.  It will be coming out here on my Substack in 2027.

I also have an essay I’m writing about how important education and participation in the system protect and promote liberty and freedom in America.

FIND ME FOR LONG FORM PUNDITRY AT SUBSTACK AS WELL http://www.theteapartypundit.substack.com/

August 2, 2008

What is the value of a high school diploma?

by Steve Dana

Even though I have ideas about a variety of topics, my blog about education was intended to draw attention to the product of the system.  Every young person that gets a diploma should have some expectation of what that certificate is worth.  Symbolically a high school diploma represents a level of achievement that should be measurable.  The minimum standards for high school graduation should give every kid the tools to do something.  I don’t suggest that it should be college prep for every kid, but there should be prep for some “next step”.  We are graduating kids who are unable to read, solve problems or communicate at junior high levels.  How can that be acceptable to anyone in the school system?  We are missing the boat with a good percentage of the “graduates”.

My comments are intended to raise an issue in my community and talk about how my community can address a local problem.  We tend to cave in to organizations with agendas when we develop our local policies because we are not up for the fight.

We can’t roll over because we are not up for the fight.  That is forfeiting our responsibility in the name of expedience.

One thing you suggest is that we already have standards I may not be aware of.  And my response would be “I am not looking at standards, I am looking at results.” 

If the results are not up to our/my expectations, the standards are either not high enough or there is no system in place that works to achieve the standards.  And I think that is the focal point of my comments; the system that works to achieve standards designed to meet local goals.

If it is acceptable to our community that many kids graduate from high school without the ability to do simple tasks, I don’t know why I should be upset.  I don’t have to hire the illiterate ones.  It is not my responsibility to be concerned about them.

I guess I thought the school board and the superintendent were the ones worrying about achieving the goals and developing the systems that would do so.  This idea of educating our kids is not one where a failure rate of 30% or 40% is acceptable.

WASL may be a flawed test system; the goal for all kids meeting “minimum” standards is not.  Whether the standards are set at a state level or a local level, it doesn’t matter.  The standards set by WASL could be the guide we use to develop higher local standards that we care about right here in our own district.  Our local expectations for student learning should always exceed state standards.

Our school board should be demanding that our superintendent develop a plan where a Snohomish Assessment of Student Learning sets benchmarks for testing/assessing at predetermined points along the way so that in core disciplines there are clear expectations and consequences for failing to meet them.  There need to be consequences for students, teachers and administrators for failure.  Certainly the consequences for the kids will be felt when we turn them out to the world after graduation when many of them discover how the system moved them along but failed to deliver an education.

Society suffers the consequences of this failure as well.  I would prefer that we be a little hard-nosed with a fourth grader, a seventh grader and a sophomore rather than a twenty year old with a gun and a bag of drugs.

We can make a difference in our own community without standing for comparison to our neighbors.  We can choose to set higher standards.  We can adopt methods that work to achieve those standards, even if they may be a little controversial.  We can take responsibility for the Snohomish School District.

 In the end, it is the results we are looking for.

July 26, 2008

Where is Hal Moe when you need him?

by Steve Dana

Another school year has been completed and we turned another batch of young people out to the world.  The class of 2008 received their diplomas, but did they get the education they need to make it in the world.

 

There has been a lot said lately about the WASL testing program.  I have never seen a “WASL” test, so I cannot comment about that specifically, but I do see young high school students in my business and I am no longer shocked, but seriously disappointed with the lack of education I see in them.

 

My comments are not meant to suggest that our local school district is failing all the kids, most of them are smart enough to succeed in spite of the system.  When I interview current high school students and recent graduates for jobs, I review their applications and I talk to them.  I don’t know much about them except what I see on paper and in conversation.  If the educational level I see in these kids is representative of the other kids in this age group, they and we are all in trouble.

 

The point of my concern is the fact that we don’t have achievement standards for kids all along the way from grade 1 to grade 12.  If a kid is not making progress along that continuum, the kid is not advanced to the next level.  In the old days, we were concerned about being promoted to the next grade.  I don’t know about kids today.

 

Whether you like WASL or not, our local school district should have promotion standards that establish respectable benchmarks that would prepare kids for life regardless of their career path.  The responsibility of the School Board is to educate kids for life.  It seems to me that we are more interested in providing the opportunity for education rather than achieving it.

 

Electives are great for a lot of kids, but basics are good for all kids.  Core classes that cover science, English, math and social studies that give the average child the tools to figure out the world are the minimum.

 

For me, I see kids that cannot write well enough to describe why I should give them a job.  In interviews I listen to kids that cannot tell me about what is happening in the world, how to solve a math problem or even rudimentary explanation for basic science questions.  When I ask about level of education, they often reply with “I wasn’t required to learn that.”

 

My question to our school district leaders is this, “What standards do we set independent of WASL that insure that kids meet a local expectation of achievement?”  If we set the bar high enough on a local level, who cares about the rest of the state?  The debate about WASL takes too much energy from the district to be healthy.  If we need to hold kids back in the fourth grade to get them on track, they will be better served than if we say that they would be too traumatized by being held back and just send them along knowing that they are not making necessary progress.

 

Our country does not demand educational excellence from our kids.  Our state does not demand educational excellence from our kids.  Currently our School District does not demand educational excellence from our kids.  That disturbs me.

 

But, we can.  If our local district takes the initiative to step up our standards we can meet the needs of our children.  It will take effort, but what worthwhile goal doesn’t take extra effort?

 

I hope we have certain expectations for kids already.  That could work as a framework for the future.  If we think a kid needs to have exposure to some part of English curriculum every year, then make that a requirement through grade 12.  Include a healthy dose of composition to help a kid communicate better.  If I had to choose between literature and composition, I would favor composition.  Half the English requirement would be in development of communication skills.

 

Social Studies curriculum includes history, geography, government and current affairs.  Every year a child should be required to take full time classes in one of these areas.

 

Math knowledge today is shockingly absent, even for the bright kids.  Calculators and computers today take all the thinking out of solving a math problem.  But, solving problems using math as a tool still requires that a kid be able to think.  If we determine that a kid needs to be able to implement math skills to solve real world situations, we get to incorporate both reasoning and knowledge of when and how to use particular buttons on the calculator to solve the problem we might be on the track.  We need to teach kids at a young age how to do basic math and build on it every year to take into account that we don’t always have a machine to do the work for us.

 

Last but not least, Science.  The quest for knowledge about why things are the way they are should be a lifelong journey.  Our school system doesn’t motivate kids to ask “why” at an early age so some of them never do.  They just accept the world as it is.

 

Science should be a part of every child’s education every year.  If we can impress upon them the need to know why something is the way it is, they can have the knowledge to know what can be changed.

 

In summary, curriculum for every child, every year should include an English component, a Social Studies component, a Math component and a Science component.  Then in order to round them out a little more, we should require some exposure to foreign language and art in some form.  The kids should be required to meet benchmarks of achievement at places along the way to make sure they are making required progress and be held back if they are not.

 

The system needs to acknowledge that some kids are already behind and refocus efforts on them to help them get on track so they don’t end up casualties of neglect.  We need to make it clear to parents that we are not hoping for excellence, we are demanding it and they have to play a part in their own kids success.